It's funny to think if one or more players make just one play in multiple game's this year and pick up that one win we are in the playoffs and not even having this discussion. I've looked at the list and I'm not impressed. I was split on wolford 50/50..I feel for 250 k he was a quality coach and great recruiter on this level. Good luck to any coach entering this program and getting that elusive 8th or 9th win to take Y.S.U. to the promise land for 250 k a year...
I agree with this part of your analysis.
"It is funny to me that:
- Coach Wolf gets on the hot seat after continued progress season after season...pressure from fans and administration.
- He continually improves the team (yes, I understand the lack of playoffs...but my eyes see improvement we were losing games on the last play in year 3. Did he win to quickly and thus 7-5 in year 5 was a bad thing?
- Less fans in the stands (they don't like the coach and its been cold outside of September)
- No playoffs and the staff gets the ax."
Z, what I don't find funny or progress is the fact that his teams went on losing streaks in each of the last 3 seasons that cost him the playoffs. If that's progress, YSU should do away with its football program.
What I don't find funny or progress is the fact that his failure to develop players is the most glaring weakness of his legacy. Yes, they weren't losing on the last play. They just failed to step up when the program NEEDED a single win. Multiple times, in multiple years and in multiple games.
What I don't find funny or progress is the fact that less people in the stands had more to do with his lack of winning a big game than who HE is. Inevitably each year fans knew there would be month where YSU would go 0-fer. Regardless of how people feel about Eric Wolford's personality, if he won that 1 or 2 games that he needed to each year, this wouldn't be a discussion. He would still be the head coach.
For the one-millionth time, YSU under Eric Wolford did not progress, nor did it improve as a whole. When you make the same mistakes every year, lose 3 straight games every year, fail to adjust during games, etc., you get removed. That is the nature of the beast.
I understand that we were very streaky. This year we ended the season with the top three teams in the Massey index. It was a very tough road. Questions arise..and yes we should have won even one of those games to prove that we were a quality team. Do you expect that change to occur overnight? In one off-season? Two? I take the later opinion of gradual change in that area. When a coach notices the streaky tendency...yes he needs to adjust his style of play and mentoring...but also his recruiting tactics on the type of player that he wants. I think this years freshman and sophomore crop could change our (I hate to keep using the word but) "streaky" tendencies.
Separately without regard to his time he and progressing or regressing the university...it is awkward to me that Wolf fits the exact bill of what we (this forum) are looking for as a coach not. Truely, should that theory not have allowed him some additional time? If you did not like his personality...and the loss at Missouri State to end year 3 and miss they playoffs then get rid of him then. If you were happy with the progress at that point, and based upon the last two years...I see reason to keep him for at least two more. Again...this point of view is from what i have read here and it seems to me that Wolf's resume fits the mold of what most are looking for.
I wish our two man search committee the best of luck in finding a great replacement.
Z