66
« on: November 26, 2013, 02:09:43 PM »
I hate to be on Paladin's "team" but when statements are made like Heacock was one of the best molders of raw talent, it's time for the rubber room. It should be PAINFULLY obvious to all on this site that 1-AA's daily genuflecting at the framed photo he has above his fireplace of Heacock (with the gold-plated inscription "To 1-AA--thanks for sticking with me, after all I did make the playoffs once in NINE years, Love, Jon) isn't going to change. Now I'm not going to defend Wolford's late-season failures at all, but Paladin's statement that Heacock was handed a championship program and Wolford wasn't, rings true. Wolford felt he needed to basically purge the roster and so he did. And his wins have increased over the 4 year span. Just looks bad that there has been faltering at the end of the year. But, again, whether Wolford is the answer or not, Heacock needed to go--and before he actually did.