YSU Penguin Athletics > YSU Penguin Athletics

YSU's progress so far

<< < (3/4) > >>

ValleyTalk:
http://www.anygivensaturday.com/showthread.php?160562-Defensive-Stats-for-Top-25-teams-Week-5
Defensive Stats for Top 25 Teams

Total Yards/Game:
1. Tennessee State (4) - 202
2. North Dakota State (4) - 241
3. Bethune-Cookman (3) - 268
4. Illinois State (2) - 286
5. Fordham (3) - 302
6. Chattanooga (3) - 303
7. Albany (3) - 307
8. Liberty (4) - 309
9. Northern Iowa (3) - 324
10. Southeastern Louisiana (4) - 328
11. South Dakota State (4) - 330
12. Southern Illinois (4) - 333
13. Montana (4) - 335
14. Richmond (4) - 345
15. Coastal Carolina (4) - 351
16. Villanova (3) - 369
17. Eastern Kentucky (4) - 378
18. Jacksonville State (3) - 381
19. Youngstown State (4) - 382
20. McNeese State (2) - 387
21. Delaware (3) - 398
22. William & Mary (4) - 413
23. Montana State (4) - 457
24. Eastern Washington (4) - 473
25. New Hampshire (3) - 483

Pass Defense/Game:
1. Liberty (4) - 96
2. Illinois State (2) - 121
3. Fordham (3) - 123
4. Tennessee State (4) - 124
5. Coastal Carolina (4) - 127
6. Delaware (3) - 133
7. Chattanooga (3) - 145
8. South Dakota State (4) - 164
9. Montana (4) - 165
10. North Dakota State (4) - 169
11. Bethune-Cookman (3) - 182
12. Southeastern Louisiana (4) - 191
13. Richmond (4) - 191
14. Southern Illinois (4) - 199
15. Northern Iowa (3) - 207
16. Eastern Washington (4) - 224
17. Albany (3) - 235
18. McNeese State (2) - 242
19. Youngstown State (4) - 248
20. Jacksonville State (3) - 249
21. William & Mary (4) - 249
22. Villanova (3) - 264
23. Eastern Kentucky (4) - 287
24. Montana State (4) - 288
25. New Hampshire

Rush Defense/Game:
1. North Dakota State (4) - 72
2. Albany (3) - 72
3. Tennessee State (4) - 78
4. Bethune-Cookman (3) - 86
5. Eastern Kentucky (4) - 91
6. Villanova (3) - 105
7. Northern Iowa (3) - 117
8. Jacksonville State (3) - 132
9. Southern Illinois (4) - 134
10. Youngstown State (4) - 134
11. Southeastern Louisiana (4) - 137
12. McNeese State (2) - 145
13. Richmond (4) - 154
14. Chattanooga (3) - 158
15. William & Mary (4) - 165
16. Illinois State (2) - 165
17. South Dakota State (4) - 166
18. Montana State (4) - 169
19. Montana (4) - 170
20. Fordham (3) - 179
21. New Hampshire (3) - 194
22. Liberty (4) - 213
23. Coastal Carolina (4) - 224
24. Eastern Washington (4) - 249
25. Delaware (3) - 265

Points Allowed/Game:
1. North Dakota State (4) - 8
2. Illinois State (2) - 8
3. Albany (3) - 11
4. Tennessee State (4) - 12
5. Coastal Carolina (4) - 14
6. Eastern Kentucky (4) - 14
7. South Dakota State (4) - 16
8. Chattanooga (3) - 17
9. Montana (4) - 18
10. Southeastern Louisiana (4) - 19
11. William & Mary (4) - 20
12. Southern Illinois (4) - 20
13. Villanova (3) - 21
14. Northern Iowa (3) - 22
15. Fordham (3) - 22
16. Youngstown State (4) - 22
17. McNeese State (2) - 24
18. Bethune-Cookman (3) - 25
19. Richmond (4) - 25
20. Liberty (4) - 27
21. Delaware (3) - 32
22. Montana State (4) - 33
23. Jacksonville State (3) - 34
24. New Hampshire (3) - 36
25. Eastern Washington (4) - 39

seanbryan3:
Statistics will start mattering in a week when we enter conference play.. I agree though that we have not collectively as a team on either side of the ball played a full 60 minute football game. Need to stay healthy and have a good month of october.  Missouri State game should be an interesting game to watch.

DavedS:

--- Quote from: ysubigred on September 19, 2014, 03:55:22 PM ---
--- Quote from: HappyPenguin on September 19, 2014, 07:17:54 AM ---Red,

Everybody is doing pretty good. Hope the same way down south where you are.

Let's just agree that neither side of the ball has delivered a knock-out 60 minute showing yet  ;)
When we are in-conference, apples to apples we'll know.

That's why i don't like these 4 games....I think a let down is unavoidable when you go from the atmosphere of playing at Illinois to hosting St. Frank.

Real season starts next game I hope we are ready, because we really have no idea.

--- End quote ---

Agreed! I believe the only complete game I've seen YSU play since the Wolford era started was Pitt.

--- End quote ---
For the most part agree ---last year vs. Illinois State they looked unbeatable and a few years back they looked good in Fargo,

sarahjkrucheck23:

--- Quote from: seanbryan3 on September 23, 2014, 02:59:58 PM ---Statistics will start mattering in a week when we enter conference play.. I agree though that we have not collectively as a team on either side of the ball played a full 60 minute football game. I must go and receive some kind of a pre settlement loan to make this right. I would stay healthy and have a good month of october.  Missouri State game should be an interesting game to watch.

--- End quote ---

Agreed.  Keep health up and october will be ours. Will the Bears be able to stop us?

ysubigred:
Since YSU is going into the 3rd game of "the real season" I thought I would revisit this for the "uninformed haters". Statistically the Defense is outperforming the offense.  :o  I cut it off at where YSU ranks in 1FCS up to this point. Interesting how SIU and YSU are ranked very closely... Although, SIU's schedule was a bit tougher.

See Below:

SCORING OFFENSE

 Rank Team G TD PAT 2PT Def FG Saf Pts PPG
 1. Eastern Wash. 7 47 43 1 0 3 0 336 48.0
 2. Montana St. 7 43 37 1 0 9 1 326 46.6
 3. Yale 4 25 21 1 0 4 0 185 46.3
 4. Fordham 7 39 36 3 0 10 1 308 44.0
 5. Illinois St. 5 28 27 0 0 7 0 216 43.2
 6. Central Ark. 7 40 34 0 0 6 2 296 42.3
 7. Villanova 6 35 30 0 0 3 1 251 41.8
 8. Alcorn 7 39 37 0 0 6 0 289 41.3
 9. Sacramento St. 7 38 35 0 0 8 0 287 41.0
 10. Southeastern La. 7 36 33 0 0 11 0 282 40.3
 11. McNeese St. 5 27 24 1 0 4 0 200 40.0
 12. Idaho St. 6 32 25 2 0 5 0 236 39.3
 13. Monmouth 6 31 26 2 0 6 0 234 39.0
 14. Princeton 4 20 16 1 0 5 0 153 38.3
 15. New Hampshire 6 30 22 5 0 4 1 226 37.7
 16. Richmond 6 28 24 2 0 9 0 223 37.2
 17. Eastern Ky. 6 27 25 1 1 8 1 217 36.2
 18. Liberty 7 33 30 1 0 7 1 253 36.1
 19. Southeast Mo. St. 7 31 29 2 0 11 0 252 36.0
 20. Mercer 7 35 32 1 0 2 0 250 35.7
 21. Saint Francis (PA) 6 28 22 3 0 6 0 214 35.7
 22. Coastal Caro. 7 32 29 0 0 9 0 248 35.4
 23. Samford 5 24 24 0 0 2 0 174 34.8
 24. Stephen F. Austin 6 28 26 1 0 4 0 208 34.7
 25. Murray St. 6 28 25 0 1 4 0 207 34.5
 26. Lamar 7 32 29 1 0 6 0 241 34.4
 27. Charleston So. 6 27 22 0 0 4 1 198 33.0
 27. Southern Ill. 7 29 28 1 0 9 0 231 33.0
 29. Jacksonville St. 6 26 24 0 0 5 0 195 32.5
 30. North Dakota St. 6 23 22 0 0 11 0 193 32.2
 31. Southern U. 7 31 25 0 0 4 1 225 32.1
 32. James Madison 7 30 28 0 0 5 0 223 31.9
 33. N.C. A&T 7 29 26 1 0 6 1 222 31.7
 34. UNI 6 19 19 0 0 18 1 189 31.5
 35. Sam Houston St. 6 24 22 0 0 7 0 187 31.2
 35. Texas Southern 6 23 22 0 0 9 0 187 31.2
 37. Western Caro. 6 25 25 0 0 3 1 186 31.0
 38. Youngstown St. 6 22 21 1 0 10 0 185 30.8

SCORING DEFENSE

 Rank Team G TD OXP 2PT DXP FGM Saf Pts Avg
 1. North Dakota St. 6 6 6 0 0 3 0 51 8.5
 2. Illinois St. 5 5 2 0 0 5 1 49 9.8
 3. Harvard 4 5 3 0 0 3 0 42 10.5
 4. Stony Brook 7 9 5 1 0 8 0 85 12.1
 5. Alcorn 7 12 11 0 0 6 1 103 14.7
 6. N.C. A&T 7 12 9 0 0 8 0 105 15.0
 6. Eastern Ky. 6 10 9 0 0 7 0 90 15.0
 8. Sacred Heart 6 13 10 0 0 1 0 91 15.2
 9. Tennessee St. 7 14 11 1 0 4 0 109 15.6
 10. Coastal Caro. 7 14 12 0 0 6 0 114 16.3
 11. Bryant 5 11 10 1 0 2 0 84 16.8
 12. Montana 6 10 9 1 0 10 0 101 16.8
 13. UNI 6 14 12 0 0 4 0 108 18.0
 13. Norfolk St. 7 15 13 0 0 7 1 126 18.0
 15. Charleston So. 6 12 10 2 1 7 0 109 18.2
 16. Albany (NY) 6 14 13 0 0 5 0 112 18.7
 16. Villanova 6 14 13 0 0 5 0 112 18.7
 18. Georgetown 7 16 15 0 0 6 1 131 18.7
 19. McNeese St. 5 12 11 0 0 4 0 95 19.0
 19. Brown 4 10 7 0 0 3 0 76 19.0
 21. Colgate 6 14 10 1 0 7 0 117 19.5
 22. Southeastern La. 7 19 15 2 0 2 0 139 19.9
 23. Indiana St. 6 13 12 0 0 10 0 120 20.0
 24. Morgan St. 6 14 12 0 0 8 1 122 20.3
 24. Furman 6 16 14 0 0 4 0 122 20.3
 26. Fordham 7 17 12 1 0 9 0 143 20.4
 27. Bucknell 6 16 15 0 0 4 0 123 20.5
 28. Southern Ill. 7 17 16 1 0 8 0 144 20.6
 29. Youngstown St. 6 16 13 0 0 5 0 124 20.7

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version